Monday, November 16, 2009

New York Times on Zeitgeist Day

This is what I rant about to my friends (who really don't want to hear it)! This is how the media uses  subtle language and word-association to discredit what they DON'T want us to pay attention to.
I copied/pasted the NYT article on Zeitgeist Day 2009 below, and I'll pick it apart for you and show you how these subtleties are used to rearrange and influence your thoughts on the subjects they cover.
My comments will be in square parentheses


They’ve Seen the Future and Dislike the Present

By ALAN FEUER
Published: March 16, 2009

Two hours into Z-Day, the educational forum associated with the online movie “Zeitgeist,” Peter Joseph, the film’s director and the evening’s M.C., stepped out from behind his lectern and walked forward earnestly on the stage.







James Estrin/The New York Times

Peter Joseph, the director of two online “Zeitgeist” movies, was applauded after criticizing the global system of monetary finance.

Before the forum started, Jacque Fresco, 93, the futurist, talked with young admirers in the audience about his Venus Project.

In his goatee and mustache and tieless in a brown suit, Mr. Joseph had been lecturing for nearly 90 minutes on the unsustainable nature of the money-based economy — on cyclical consumption, planned obsolescence, corporate malfeasance and piles of poisonous waste. “It’s time that we wake up,” he intoned, speaking solemnly through a wireless clip-on mike. “The doomsday scenario, the big contraction, might be happening right now. The system of monetary exchange is — in the face of advancing technology — completely obsolete.”

This drew wild applause from the sold-out crowd, a patchwork of perhaps 900 people who paid $10 a head on Sunday night to sit in a packed auditorium at the Borough of Manhattan Community College on Chambers Street near the West Side Highway. Z-Day events were taking place from New England to New Zealand, but this was the big one: the marquee happening with the marquee names.

There, in the crowd, was Jacque Fresco, an industrial designer and the engineering guru of what people unironically called “the movement.” Mr. Fresco, an elfin 93-year-old, sat beside his partner, Roxanne Meadows, smiling self-effacingly.

Mr. Joseph, back on stage, waited patiently as some of the crowd, still cheering, refused to leave their feet.

If the election of Barack Obama was supposed to denote the gradual demise of churlish, corporate governance and usher in a new, sustainable era of visionary change, there was little sign of it at the second annual meeting of the Worldwide Zeitgeist Movement, which, its organizers said, held 450 sister events in 70 countries around the globe.

“The mission of the movement is the application of the scientific method for social change,” Mr. Joseph announced by way of introduction. The evening, which began at 7 with a two-hour critique of monetary economics, became by midnight a utopian [the ZM and TVP are in no way claiming utopianism, but they just HAD to squeeze this in to make the concepts of the movement appear unrealistic]) presentation of a money-free and computer-driven vision of the future, a wholesale reimagination of civilization, as if Karl Marx [Karl Marx was a communist - communism is a monetary system - the ZM and TVP are not monetary systems and in NO WAY resemble communism] and Carl Sagan had hired John Lennon from his “Imagine” days [another way to discredit the movement by associating us with the "hippie days" and unrealistic daydreamers] to do no less than redesign the underlying structures of planetary life. [Planetary life? No. 'Human interaction' with planetary life - how humans affect planetary life - not the functions of planetary life. We're only trying to control our own greed. But they suggest here that we're trying to "take over the world" and play god]

In other words, a not entirely inappropriate response to the zeitgeist itself, which one young man, a philosophy student in a roomy purple blazer, described before the show began as “the world as we know it coming to an end.” [This makes it sound like the "End of the World". See the "word association game" the media plays here?] As the evening labored on ["labored" on - like everyone was really hating this event] with a Power Point presentation, a panel talk with Mr. Fresco and a spirited question and answer session, some basic themes emerged: modern economics is a fraud; global debt will crush the planet; society itself is dying from the profit motive; and people ought to wise up to the fact that more than legislation — or presidential administrations — needs to change.

Though they were never actually shown [Here, they suggest that the fact they were not shown meant maybe there was something about the films that made them NOT show them]— as most in attendance had seen them several times — Mr. Joseph’s two films, “Zeitgeist, the Movie” (released in 2007) and “Zeitgeist: Addendum” (released last fall), were the subtext of the evening: online documentaries that have been watched, he says, [the media suggest here, by saying "he says", that Peter is making all this shit up.] by 50 million people around the world.

The former may be most famous for alleging that the attacks of Sept. 11 were an “inside job” perpetrated by a power-hungry government on its witless population, a point of view that Mr. Joseph said he has recently “moved away from.” Indeed, the second film, the focus of the event, was all but empty of such conspiratorial notions, directing its rhetoric and high production values toward posing a replacement for the evils of the banking system and a perilous economy of scarcity and debt.

That’s where Mr. Fresco came in, an author, lecturer and former aircraft engineer at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio who has spent the last six decades working on the Venus Project, a futuristic society where (adjust your seatbelts, now) [by "adjusting your seatbelts", they are suggesting that what Jacque has been working on is about as far fetched an idea as you're gonna find anywhere] machines would control government [that's NOT what TVP is about - machines won't "control" things any more than they do now - people do. Decisions will be arrived at the way you arrive at a decision to lower your altitude when an airplane's altimeter tells you that you are at too high an altitude. Machines will be merely used more efficiently, and to help humanity, not corporations] and industry and safeguard the planet’s fragile resources by means of an artificially intelligent “earthwide autonomic sensor system” — a super-brain of sorts connected to, yes, [They add the word "yes" to suggest that this concept is unbelievable] all human knowledge.

If this sounds vaguely like a disaster scenario out of “2001: A Space Odyssey,” [Word association again - they have to pull some far-fetched sci-fi movie out of their asses to make you think that just might happen] Mr. Fresco did not seem worried in the least. Machines are unemotional and unaggressive, unlike human beings, he told the crowd during the question-and-answer phase. “If you took your laptop and smashed it in front of 50 other laptops, trust me, none of them would care.”

The audience — white, black, young, old, baseball caps and business suits alike — received such words like a tonic, and the questions kept coming: What would family life be like in the future? What would happen if the automated system decided that a person had to die? [Notice the NYT never published the answers to these questions - just the questions that would make you completely against the movement] Mr. Fresco and Ms. Meadows are planning the production of a major feature film to bring the Venus Project to a wider, global audience. Before the night began, Mr. Fresco, a small man with a V-neck sweater and a hearing aid, sat signing books and answering questions from a dozen or so college students gathered like acolytes at his feet. [acolyte: an acolyte is anyone who performs ceremonial duties such as lighting altar candles. In other Christian Churches, the term is more specifically used for one who wishes to attain clergyhood." Note here that using this term immediately subliminally suggests these folks are members af some kind of religion - even a cult - if they're "gathered at his feet" - see how carefully the NYT writers choose their words?]

As the evening came to a close, someone finally asked: So what would it take to actually put such a program into action? A grassroots movement, Mr. Joseph said.

“We already have a quarter-million members,” he insisted from the stage. [They use the word "insisted" as if maybe it wasn't true and the numbers were in question and he was defending his claim"] “At the rate things are going, this will be at Madison Square Garden next year.”

Pay close attention to what the news media says, but pay closer attention to how they say it! The sooner you learn to listen to their word-association games, the sooner you'll see how they attempt to influence your thinking through subliminal suggestion.